The Sadistic Dajjalic Rafidi Pseudo-Mahdi Wants to Lash the Prophet’s (ﷺ) Wife!

NB: Abu Ja’far Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Babawayh al-Qummi, i.e., from Qom (d. 381 AH/991 CE) (known by the Rafidah as ‘Sadooq’—“the habitual truth-teller”—and by Ahl al-Sunnah as ‘Kadhoob,’ the “habitual liar”) was a Persian Majoosi zindiq who lived during the pre-Safavid era, when Persia (Iran), though majority Sunni, already had pockets of Shia and Rafidah in its lands—the bitter descendants of the defeated and humiliated Sasanian Majoos. Much like Sunni Iraq (which was occupied by Persia before the dawn of Islam), Persia also harboured pockets of various Rafidi Shia groups, with a large following among the Persian crypto-Majoosi zanadiqah who had lived in Iraq since the Sasanian occupation. To this day, many Rafidah in Iraq—especially the cleric clans—are of Persian descent; among them are the Sistanis, Khoies, Nakhjavanis (“Nakshawani”), Shirazis, Ghazvinis (“Qazwinis”), Modarresis, and other Absurdistanis.

To illustrate the extent to which the accursed Tashayyu’ (Shiism) developed in its early history: in Iraq during the 1st century AH (7th century CE), following the martyrdom of al-Husayn (may Allah be pleased with him), a group known as the Kaysaniyyah emerged, led by the zindiq Mukhtar. This group, primarily composed of Persian zanadiqah with dualist Zoroastrian (Majoosi) beliefs, Gnosticism, and Batinism, loathed the Sahabah, defied Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him), and claimed that Ali’s son, Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyyah, went into occultation as the hidden Imam Mahdi.

Thus, some parts of Iraq and later Persia (specifically the accursed cesspool of shirk and khurafat, Qom) became centres of crypto-Majoos, the spiritual sons of Abu Lu’lu’ al-Majoosi, who nurtured the seeds planted by Ibn Saba the Jew in Iraq and later sowed them in Persia, continuing to distort Islam in the name of ‘loving and following the Ahl al-Bayt’.

Essentially, Ibn Babawayh the Qommite was one of these crypto-Majoos, and mind you, he is not just any Twelver Shia scholar but a pillar of their religion in terms of scholarship, as he is the author of one of the four major Shia hadith collections, Man La Yahduruhu al-Faqih, which is considered one of the most authoritative collections of hadith in Twelver Shia Islam and is filled with kufr and ghuluw (exaggeration).

As for his work, Illal al-Shara’i’, in which this zindiq recorded that Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her) will be tortured by the sadistic Rafidi Mahdi, know that this book is highly revered by Shia scholars. It is a theological and philosophical text that seeks to provide understanding and justification for various aspects of Shia belief and practice. It is deeply rooted in Twelver Shia creed, reflecting their theological perspective, including their views on the Sahabah and even on the Prophet’s (ﷺ) wives.

This is why we later see Rafidi scholars, like the arch zindiq Majoosi Muhammad Baqir Majlisi II, the grand Shia authority of the Safavid palace and court in his time, including in his Bihar al-Anwar (al-Dhulumat) Ibn Babawayh’s sadistic narration of the dajjalic Rafidi ‘Mahdi’ resurrecting the Mother of the Believers, Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her), the beloved wife of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)—in order to torture her, like the sadistic Dajjal that pseudo-Mahdi is.

So, any Rafidi telling you these narrations are weak is merely playing the sanad (chain of narration) game—a game (in its true Islamic form, a sacred science, of course) of no importance to their sanad-less cult anyway, as their scholars accept whatever fits their whims and desires. This is why we see them preaching this kind of kufr openly in Rafidi Iran, the same hypocritical entity that claims Shia-Sunni unity.